Why it matters
- High-value audiences are opting out
In the UK, users can now pay £2.99/month on web or £3.99/month via mobile apps to remove ads. These early adopters are often exactly the kind of audience brands want most – but once they subscribe, they’re out of reach. - Ad inventory shrinks, competition rises
If more users pay for ad-free, the number of ads that can be shown – the impressions – goes down. With less space but the same demand, competition pushes up costs, so brands may end up paying more for the same visibility. - Targeting becomes less precise
When users choose ad-free or reduced-tracking models, platforms lose behavioural data. Advertisers will need to shift towards broader targeting, contextual relevance, and stronger creative. - Owned and influencer channels gain importance
Ad-free doesn’t mean content-free. Creator partnerships, brand storytelling, and first-party data strategies will become critical for reaching audiences that step outside the ad ecosystem.
Regulation is shaping these moves
- In the EU, Meta was required to offer what’s known as a FAWBA – a “Free Alternative Without Behavioural Advertising.” In practice, that means a free version where users only see basic, non-targeted ads instead of personalised ones. For advertisers, it reduces precision and makes campaigns less efficient.
- In the UK, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has allowed a simpler choice: ads or subscription, and at a lower price point than in Europe. The ICO even noted that “online platforms, like every business, need to operate commercially.”
- In the U.S. and APAC, there’s no widespread rollout yet. Privacy rules are patchier and consumers are generally less willing to pay for ad-free social, but with regulation evolving and platforms already testing models, it’s a space to watch.
The result? Fragmented markets, where what’s possible in London may not match Berlin, New York, or Singapore. Advertisers will need to adapt campaigns accordingly.
How many people really pay to avoid ads?
Looking at other platforms helps set expectations:
- Spotify: ~276 million paying subscribers out of ~696 million total monthly active users (~40%). But music ads are especially disruptive, so this is a high-end benchmark.
- YouTube Premium: ~100 million subscribers worldwide, compared to more than 2 billion total users — only around 5% pay despite frequent video ads.
- Snapchat+: ~11 million paying users out of ~420 million total — about 2.5%.
- X (Twitter) Premium: ~1–2 million paying subscribers out of ~500 million monthly active users – less than 0.5%.
Even where ads feel intrusive, most people stick with the free, ad-supported version. On social platforms, ad-free subscribers are likely to remain a niche group – but often the most valuable users.
So how do advertisers respond? Beyond paid activity, advertisers should also think about how to generate earned and organic impressions. Campaigns that encourage people to share their own stories – for example, highlights of their year, experiences, or milestones – can extend reach into networks that ads can’t buy. For universities, that could mean turning student journeys into shareable content on TikTok or Instagram. When done well, these approaches build trust, spark peer-to-peer influence, and continue to generate visibility long after the paid campaign has ended.
Final thought
For advertisers, the challenge is no longer simply how to buy reach at scale. It’s how to build meaningful, lasting relationships in an environment where reach is no longer guaranteed. Success will depend on striking the right balance: using data responsibly, being creative enough to stand out, and investing in genuine connections that outlast a single campaign.
If you’d like to explore what these changes mean for your advertising plans, get in touch. Email Kim McLellan.